Discussion about this post

User's avatar
peter brown leighton's avatar

Couldn't agree more... I operate under the assumption that my digital archives, including source files, are finite. Who even knows what a camera will look like in 50 years. It may be implanted in our heads between our eyes. I don't know. But I figure my files after I'm gone will most likely not survive long term, no matter what. My archival paper prints, though, could possibly last hundreds of years, just sitting in a box. Imagine being a collector running across even a mundane, paper-based photograph, printed from a digital file in 2020, 200 years from now. Look no further than the community of analog snapshot collectors today to get a feeling for how that kind of discovery might resonate.

donna's avatar

I mostly shoot parts, textures, not whole scenes, and work on composites. I also am not in love with traditional framing. A few years ago I decided what I'd loved nearly all my life was, books. I settled on the accordion book form. I print variously long composites on 17" matte roll papers. The paper has to bend well without flaking/breaking. They're layered, scrim, glue, matboard inside. Fabric on the back, + loops so they can be hung on walls, or placed on tables. I like that they zigzag in and out. Visual information is not revealed all at once. The view changes as you walk past them. It's taken forever to experiment and get more comfortable with materials and the form. I keep thinking I'm almost there! Less expensive than framing - but more time consuming.

8 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?